Portland versus Occupy

On November 10th, Portland Mayor Sam Adams issues a statement declaring that the Occupy Portland protestors leave the premises so that city could clean up the parks (Lownsdale and Chapman Squares). Thanks to Portland Online for the following statement written by Portland’s mayor(but posted by Amy Ruiz):

Since Occupy Portland began five weeks ago, I have been very clear in my objective: We must balance people’s rights to free speech, with keeping the city safe and moving. From the beginning, behavior has mattered.
We have maintained our balance through day-to-day decisions regarding Occupy Portland. While the Constitution requires city governments to facilitate speech by citizens, city governments also have the authority and responsibility to regulate associated behaviors on behalf of the general public. 
In the past few days, the balance has tipped: We have experienced two very serious drug overdoses, where individuals required immediate resuscitation in the camp. As has been widely reported, police have arrested a suspect in Tuesday night’s disturbing Molotov cocktail incident. Crime, especially reported assaults, has increased in the area in and around the camps. This is in addition to the health and sanitation issues that the camp’s close quarters have brought about.
Occupy has had considerable time to share its movement’s messages with the public, but has lost control of the camps it created. The cost to the larger community is rapidly increasing.
Now, the City of Portland finds itself at a turning point. 
The City will soon temporarily close Lownsdale and Chapman Squares to the public, to put an end to safety, health and crime problems, and to repair the park land. When the City re-opens the parks, the City will enforce all park and criminal laws in the Squares and the sidewalks, and the park land will be available for large, organized speech events by permit.  
At 12:01 am on Sunday, November 13, all persons and property in Lownsdale and Chapman Squares will again be subject to enforcement of all laws including the laws against being in a park after midnight (PCC 20.12.210), and erecting structures in a park (PCC 20.12.080). On or after November 13, by authority of Portland City Code, the City will close Lownsdale and Chapman Squares for repair and to remediate any remaining safety, health and crime problems.  
Portland Police are carefully preparing for this closure, and share my goal for an orderly and peaceful closure to the camps. 
I want to make it clear that this action is not an action against the Occupy Portland movement. 
In fact, the Occupy Portland movement has highlighted the challenges our community, like many across the country, are facing with homelessnesss. Too many in our community are without a safe place to call home. Despite fiscal challenges, the City has continued to invest in long term solutions to end homelessness. Commissioner Fish and I will be working closely with our dedicated network of service providers to make sure everyone at the camp is aware of the resources that are available. Experienced outreach workers will be reaching out to the homeless people at the camp to help them access existing resources in our community, like health care, emergency shelter, permanent housing placement assistance, and short term needs. 
I have said from the beginning that I believe the Occupy movement would have to evolve in order to realize its full potential.
It is my sincere hope that the movement, with its focus on widespread economic inequity, will flourish in its next phase—a phase where we can focus all of our energies on economic and social justice, not on port-a-potties and tents. I believe Occupy Portland can lead the nation in this next phase of the Occupy Movement, and I personally look forward to working with participants toward their broader goals. 
I also want to extend my thanks to: Occupy Portland participants, who by and large are non-violent, peaceful, and dedicated to the larger vision of this movement; Occupy’s appointed liaisons, who have worked hard to communicate clearly with City and Police officials; Our city’s unions, who have stepped in to help with sanitation issues in the camp; Social service providers and first responders, for the support they’ve provided to the camp’s most vulnerable population. 
I also want to thank my council colleagues and their staffs, for their assistance in troubleshooting the day-to-day issues we’ve faced along the way, and the men and women of the Portland Police bureau, who have worked tirelessly to facilitate these unprecedented events in a peaceful and professional manner. 
And to the broader community, I thank you for your understanding and support of the approach we have taken to balancing the right to free speech, with the need to keep our city safe and moving.   
Sam Adams
This letter is very well written, clearly and respectfully stating, as the Mayor sees it, the timeline of events. Mayor Adams also did as he said, he asked the protestors to vacate the park and left the rest up to the police.  On eviction night, it was estimated that 3,000 +/- people came out to show their support of the movement, or to see or be a part of a potential confrontation with police. Apparently, only about 50 people were arrested in what, at the time, was being heralded on both sides as a success. The police did not use force and the protestors didn’t have to leave at midnight. The next day there was another confrontation with police wherein protestors were removed from the squares or arrested and all the remaining materials in the squares was thrown away. Of course, before this part of the day, volunteers (protestors and others) were actively cleaning up the park before the police actually began their own clean up, some of the news (KPTV FoxNews 12) even said in their live stream that the volunteers were seeming very thorough in their efforts.

Published by livingtheamericandreamineurope

I live in Europe, I am from America.

2 thoughts on “Portland versus Occupy

    1. A poll released on November 16 by Public Policy and Polling suggests that OWS is wearing thin for general voters, “Only 33% now say that they are supportive of its goals, compared to 45% who say they oppose them. That represents an 11 point shift in the wrong direction for the movement’s support compared to a month ago when 35% of voters said they supported it and 36% were opposed. Most notably independents have gone from supporting Occupy Wall Street’s goals 39/34, to opposing them 34/42 (Public Policy Polling, 16.11.11).” The press release goes on to say that the public is also tired of the Tea Party, with 45% opposed to their “general goals”.

      The press release does go on to discuss the public’s general distrust and dislike of congress and primarily all things government, so this makes me think, regardless of who the public thinks is ‘on top’ or ‘right’ these groups are helping expose (along with the politicians themselves) the corruption of the current way of business in the US (and around the world).

      Here is the press release which links to the raw data: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2011/11/occupy-wall-street-favor-fading.html

I love comments and feedback, so leave me some.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: